And generally speaking, lower-power CPUs are still much less powerful than high-power-consumption CPUs of the same CPU generation.
The reason is to save battery, and if the CPU were allowed to run anywhere close to Adobe's minimum recommended clock speed requirement, the battery will "die out" (or more specifically, become discharged enough to require recharging via the AC mains outlet) before you get much if any rendering work done. If you're going to be running strictly on battery power, no laptop is sufficient for video editing because they cap their maximum CPU clock speed to far below Adobe's minimum recommendation. Will the MacBook perform better then my current old system? Are there any problems with Premiere and this MacBook Pro? I don't care if the final render process takes some time.ĭo you think this MacBook is sufficient for my editing needs? I'm aware that a non-mobile workstation would provide better performance, but doesn't allow to edit mobilely. My workflow includes the creation of proxy and I'm fine with sticking to proxies. I'm doing small projects on a non-professional base (3 to 20 minute films) with DSLR/DSLM material (Panasonic G85, DJI Mavic Pro). At home I would use the MacBook with a big external screen. I travel from time to time in long distance trains and would love to use this time for editing. I'm currently thinking about buying a MacBook Pro 13,3" (2,3 GHz Dual‑Core Intel Core i5, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD (+ external SSD), Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640).
How much ram can macbook pro early 2013 handle Pc#
My current old PC (Intel i7 (first generation i-7 950 quadcore) 3,06 GHZ, Asus Sabertooth X58 mainboard, Geforce GTX 570 graphic card, 6 GB RAM) has some problems and I'm thinking about replacing it but I'm on a budget.
0 kommentar(er)
